"THE TRUTH"

2006/10/31

"WHAT HAPPENS IF AFRICAN-AMERICANS STAY AT HOME ON NOVEMBER 7TH?"

@ 04:04 PM (36 months, 22 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH: WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

                                  WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

Many European-Americans see African-Americans as a monolith.  In other words, "We All Act The Same Way." We eat the same foods; our speaking pattern is the same; we worship God in the same church:we all know one another. Are you starting to get my drift? 

I am reminded of a story that the late comedian, Richard Pryor once related. Pryor said that during his career, he once turned up in Africa to film a movie.  One night, the locals started to talk, "Very Loudly."

Pryor says his White colleagues became "Noticeably Anxious." One of them looked at Pryor "With Large Bug Eyes," and asked, "What Are They Saying?" Pryor didn't miss a beat. This comedic genius replied. "Why Are You Asking Me? I Speak English, Just Like You". Opps.

The Democratic Party is similar to many European-Americans.  They think African-Americans possess the intellect of a slug.

Since the days of Lyndon Baines Johnson, modern day Democrats have been treating its core constituents like chattel slaves.  And incredibly, Blacks continue to support this, "STAND FOR NOTHING PARTY."

Democrats for their part, are like the "Pusher Man." By this I mean, Democrats administer to Blacks their daily "Fix." Many Black Americans exhibits similar traits to those of a crack-head or heroin addict. They need:

- Medicaid And Welfare

- Community Programs

-Affirmative Action

However, we seemed to have gotten along quite well, thank you,  before LBJ came up with the bright idea, of "THE GREAT SOCIETY." But, his "Great Society" turned into a bust. Not only has it created a couple of generations dependent on medicaid and welfare, Johnson's debacle has polarized this country to this day.

Modern day Democrats are good at hinting to Black Americans that Republicans are a group of "Racist White Boys." They do this in order to frighten Blacks; and thus deepen their dependence  on Democrats.

Democrats are afraid to preach to it's African-American base, "AUTONOMY." Autonomy spells "Freedom."  Freedom to think.  Freedom to choose. Freedom to vote for a Republican, if that candidate supports what you believe in.

No, the Democratic Party is not a party of light. It loves to keep its constituents, both Blacks and Whites in the dark. You don't think so?

Consider this for a moment. What are the Democrats plans for Iraq, should they assume the leadership of the House and the Senate?

What are the Democrats plans for fighting terrorism?

What are the Democrats plans for dealing with an "ALREADY ROBUST ECONOMY?"

You're right.  Democrats haven't given Americans any credible answers on any of the questions that I've outlined. This is a party that can't give you any answers, because they don't know where they are going. It is like the "Blind Leading The Blind."

The Democratic Party has traits of a Paranoid Schizophrenic.

A Paranoid Schizophrenic who fails to take his medication, faces decompensation.  In other words, that person is opening himself to psychotic behavior, i.e., seeing things, hearing sounds that are not really there. Feeling threatened.

A Paranoid Schizophrenic can be dangerous. They are "All Over The Place With Their Convoluted Thinking."

Now, do you see the comparison of a Paranoid Schizophrenic and members of the Democratic Party?

Frankly, this is a party that you simply can not trust. Would you trust someone to look after your home while you and your family go on vacation:and you knew nothing about that person? Of course not. So, why do the Democrats feel that voters should give them the keys to the House Of Representatives and possibly the U.S. Senate on November 7th?

As I mentioned at the outset, Democrats are good at reminding African-Americans about alleged "Racist Republicans." However, they deftly omit "Racist Democrats", past and present from their ranks.

It was a "Democrat," George Wallace, the then Governor of Alabama, who stood in the schoolhouse doors to prevent two black college students from registering at the University of Alabama on June 11th, 1963.

Democratic President, John Kennedy, federalized the Alabama National Guard, and Wallace was forced to move his "Democratic Carcass from the University's doors.

John Kennedy was a Liberal Democrat. However, I doubt if he would be welcomed into today's Liberal Democratic Party.

Kennedy was a man who put partisan politics aside. He dealt with the Cuban missisle crisis, "LIKE A MAN."

Can you imagine a Liberal Democratic President from today's ilk having to deal with a crisis of this proportion?

I shutter, even as I write this. These people really do put the fear of God in me.

How about the "Grand Kleagle" of the Ku-Klux-Klan, none other than West Virginia U.S. Senator, Robert Byrd?

Byrd once recruited 150 of his friends to join one of the most reviled terrorist groups in the history of the United States.

No, Robert Byrd, Democrat of West Virginia, never hid his hatred of Black people.

It is said that Byrd has seen the "Light," and has admitted that what he did was wrong.

Then, why was it only a few years ago, the "Grand Kleagle" used the term "White Nigger, hmmm?

What about good old Jesse Jackson calling New York City, "Hymie Town." His buddy, Al, "I'm A Reverend, Sharpton, who said of jews, "They Are Diamond Merchants, And Interlopers."

Former California Lt. Governor, Cruz Bustamante once called Blacks while appearing before a black trade unionist meeting, "Niggers." Now, that's a guy with "CAJONES." Is Cruz Bustamante still alive?

I could give you more comments from the "Peace Loving Liberal Democrats," but I'm sick to my stomach having to write about these phoneys.

Their buddies in the "Hit And Run Media" are like the three monkeys, "See Nothing, Hear Nothing, and Speaking Nothing, involving Democrats who have a case of the "Slip Of The Tongue."

For those on the left, are you really willing to follow the Democrats off the ledge?

My advice to all Americans, when you see someone with a weapon, and they plan to commit suicide, "GET OUT OF THE WAY."

My advice to African-Americans, when will you grow weary of being told how to think? When will you grow up and use that marvelous organ that floats in cerebrospinal fluid, "YOUR BRAIN?"

MY NEW BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION," CAN BE PURCHASED AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE . AND AT, WWW.AMAZON.COM .

MY OTHER BOOK, "I HAD TO SAY IT," CAN BE FOUND AT WWW.AMAZON.COM

 

"WHAT IF THE POLLSTERS AND THE HIT AND RUN MEDIA ARE WRONG?"

@ 07:59 AM (36 months, 22 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH":

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

The demise of the Republican Party may have been greatly exaggerated.

Pollsters and pundits have told the Democratic Party to start measuring the drapes in the House, because they will be in charge after the November election.

I know that I am one of those who have written that the Democrats will regain control of the House. Being a Conservative, I did so with much hesitation.

But, what happens if this writer, the pollsters, and the "Hit And Run Media" are all wrong?

I pose this question because if I'm wrong, so what. But pollsters and the Hit And Run Media can't say the same thing. They have been working overtime to insure a Democratic victory on November 7th. They act as though they are possessed. Impartiality is not even factored into this year's political equation. Like a group of cheerleaders, the pollsters and the Hit And Run Media with pom-poms in hand, are cheering for the Democrats. RAH-RAH, GO, DEM-O-CRATS. "BOO-HISS TO THE REPUBLICANS." Media and pollster decorum has been tossed out of the window. What blows my mind is, these shameless, arrogant people don't give a damn if you see what they are doing.

The two groups have invested heavily in a defeat for the Republican Party.

The pollsters with their questions phrased, so that they get the answers they want. The Hit And Run Media focusing negatively on Republicans; and at the same time, showing their buddies in the Democratic Party in a positive light.

The Hit And Run Media has failed to do its job, "AGAIN." They have not gone after the Democrats and asked them what will they do differently if they are voted in as the majority in the House. They know what the Democrats will do, and that is  nothing. However, the media understands that Liberal Democrats will push for their secular issues, things like, gay marriage, gun control, affirmative action, and the big one, "BRING THE TROOPS HOME, NOW."

But, the Liberal Democratic Party will not fight to put an end to partisanship in Washington. Apparently, they love to see the country at loggerheads. And it appears they love to see the country divided  into "Red And Blue States."

But what happens if the Democrats wake up next Wednesday morning and they are still in the minority. Pollsters have gotten it wrong in the past; and there is a good chance they have gotten this election all wrong.

The Hit And Run Media will be furious. The credibility of all pollsters will be questioned by  Americans. Pollsters will have a lot of "Splaning" to do.

The President has hit the campaign trail. He has a look in his eye that speaks of confidence. Karl Rove is also smiling and oozing confidence.  Not a good sign for the "Cut And Run Crowd." With only eight days until the election,  expect several things to happen:

- Osama Bin Laden will release a videotape, hoping to influence our election

- The Hit And Run Media will go into overdrive with its daily Iraqi body count of dead U.S. Servicemen/women

- The Hit And Run Media will continue its shameless policy of showing the American

   public that as a group, they are unabashed "Liberals". Therefore, expect to see a plethora

  of positive "PUFF" pieces on Democrats

- Last minute polls showing us how badly Republicans will fare on November 7th

If the Democrats are left mortally wounded,  this will place them on life support for the 2008 Presidential election. My advice, "DO NOT RESUSCITATE PLEASE, IF BODY IS ATTACHED TO LIFE SUPPORT."

2006/10/29

"WILL YOU TAKE A STAND, OR SIT ON THE SIDELINES?"

@ 06:01 AM (36 months, 24 days ago)

BY: FOREST LEWIS, Ph.D.

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

                                                                                           FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

                                                                                           WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

                                                                                           WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

Someone once stated very poignantly, "If You Don't Stand For Something, You'll Fall For Anything."

There is an awful lot of truth in such a terse statement. As I see it, if you take a stand on an issue, it means that you have examined that issue with the utmost scrutiny.

You have carefully weighed the pros and cons of the subject matter in question, and you have concluded that the issue is worth fighting for.

There are people in this country who are willing to "Fall On Their Sword Over Any And All Issues."  In my mind, that is foolish; because when it is time to deal with the important matters impacting our country, these people will be exhausted. Not to mention, their ability to argue a point would be severely impaired.

That is why it is so important to choose your battles "Very Carefully".

There are those in our volatile society today who try to control your thinking through trickery and obfuscating an issue.

Take for example the actor Micheal J. Fox. He has in essence told voters that Republicans "WANT THEM TO DIE." No, he didn't use those exact words, however, that is the crux of his argument for stem cell research. Fox without saying it, is telling Americans that the Democrats are the only ones who care about whether they live or die.  So, come Tuesday, November 7th, put the Democrats in charge of both houses; and people will be cured of Parkinson's, diabetes, spinal injuries, ect, etc, ect.

Of course Michael J. Fox is lying. And in order to see through his lies, you have to be able to process what he says. Fox and those around him are counting on Americans to react viscerally, instead of studying indepth, what his message is about.

Don't believe Fox when he says, "I Don't Care About Politics." This guy supported John Kohn-Kerry in the 2004 Presidential race. He campaigned tirelessly for Kohn-Kerry.  By the way, I use the hyphenated Kohn-Kerry, because Senator Kohn-Kerry is of Jewish lineage. His grandfather, Fritz Kohn, changed the family's surname to Kohn upon his arrival to the United States in 1902.  However, Kohn-Kerry has tried to fool Americans into believing that he is of Irish Descent.

This is a man who "STANDS FOR NOTHING." I say that because anytime you run from who you are, you are telling me that you are ashamed of your ethnicity. One's pedigree is the very core of his/her existence. Kohn-Kerry's message is, "I DESPISE MY FAMILY'S LINEAGE."

You would be amazed at the number of people who are out of touch with the myriad issues that could shape our country's future forever. These peope think they are doing the country a favor by "Staying Out Of the Fight(s)".

They only embolden the adversaries of freedom. They encourage those who's only objection is to tear the traditional family asunder.

Intially, the homosexual community called on Americans to "Be Tolerant." Americans became tolerant.  This alternative lifestyle community decided to push the envelope.  They started challenging individual states for the right "To Marry."

The Supreme Court of Massachusetts by a 4 to 3 margin opened the door to legal gay marriages. However, here is something I doubt if you have given much thought to. Gays aren't interested in just "Getting Married To Someone Of The Same Gender."

The homosexual community wants to "TEAR DOWN THE INSTITUTION OF TRADITIONAL MARRIAGES." These people have made a mockery of traditional marriages by what they are doing in Massachusetts. That was their plan all along.

So, the question is why? Well, homosexuals are angry.  They are angry because they know deep down in their hearts that two people of the same gender "ARE NOT MARRIED." The entire notion is just plain ludicrous. And gays know this.

I don't care how you slice it: a marriage is between a Man and a Woman. Gays would have us believe that their agenda is benign. Don't believe it. Their agenda is a threat to civilization as we know it.

Those who pander to the gay community will say they were born that way. Any first year biology student could refute that argument.

Both men and women have chemicals in their brains. Some of these chemicals are, (1) Testosterone, and (2) Progesterone.

Men have more "Testosterone" in their bodies than do women; conversely, women have more Progesterone in their bodies than do men.

If a gay man is a woman in a man's body, then his Testosterone level should be the same as a female's. The same argument holds true for a female who says she was born gay. Her Testosterone level should be on par with that of a hetorosexual male. and her Progesterone levels should be the same as a straight male. Understand?

However, the fact of the matter is most gay men have the same Testosterone level as you and I have. Their Progesterone level is also the same as our's.

Most gay females have the same Testosterone level as our wives do; and their Progesterone levels are also on par with that of our wives.

Despite what science says, pandering politicians continue to say,"THEY WERE BORN THAT WAY."

The entire issue of "Nurturance" is not even considered. In my work with gay individuals, 9 out of 10 of these people were incested at an early age by either a family member; or a friend of the family.

For many of these individuals, the incestuous behavior continued for years. When it stopped, the person "FELT THAT THEY WERE GAY." Now, what do you think?

A simple DNA test could clear up this nonesense. However, I'm willing to bet you that the homosexal community would not go for this. Why? They know that the "JIG" would be up.

If that was the case, pandering psychiatrists who for years labeled homosexuality as a mental health disorder would have to return to square one.

Some might argue, why am I as a Psychologist dealing with the issue. Like I said at the outset, "YOU EITHER STAND FOR SOMETHING, OR YOU'LL FALL FOR ANYTHING."

Secular homosexuals need to be stopped. We need to bring to the table of discussion, rational and well thought out ideas.

The Democratic Party doesn't stand for anything. They use African-Americans. And recently, we have learned that they are anti-gay. Take a look at how they raked Mark Foley over he coals.

Take a look at how they march out time and time again, individuals who have been the victims of a tragedy. People like Cindy Sheehan, The Jersey Girls and Michael J. Fox.

"These Victims" can beat up on Republicans; and we are told that we can not respond to their lies and misinformation. Otherwise, we will be seen as mean-spirited.

Actually, it is the Democratic Party that is mean-spirited. One has to be really heartless to use people in the way that the Democratic Party does.

Next week, Americans will go to the polls and decide whether to keep the Republicans in power or place "San Francisco's" Nancy Pelosi in as "Majority Leader" of the U.S. Congress.

So, my fellow Americans, "What Do You Stand For?"

MY BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION" CAN BE PURCHASED AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE.

MY OTHER BOOK, "I HAD TO SAY IT" CAN BE BOUGHT THROUGH WWW.AMAZON.COM.

 

 

2006/10/28

"SO-CALLED "HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS" ARE THE FRIENDS OF TERRORISTS"

@ 07:50 AM (36 months, 25 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

BY:DR. FOREST LEWIS

    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

You know what folks? I don't give a damn what these Socialist Human Rights Groups have to say about our policies of interrogating terrorists. And I certainly don't give a damn about What John AKA, KOHN-KERRY has to say either.

Kohn-Kerry will lay in wait like the snake that he is,  for a chance to rip at the Bush Administration. This loud-mouth, monotone, Massachusetts liberal will say just about anything, if he thinks it will gain him some political mileage.

In order for this guy to become credible in my book, he has to step up and "TELL THE WORLD THAT HE IS JEWISH AND NOT IRISH."  If KOHN-KERRY lies about his ethnicity, what else is he lying about?

The fact of the matter is that Kohn-Kerry's grandfather lived in the Czech Republic. There, he was known as "Fritz Kohn."

Escaping anti-semitism, Fritz Kohn settled in the United States around 1902. In order to avoid discrimination in his adopted country,  Fritz Kohn reportedly placed a map on the family dinner table one evening. He announced that he would close his eyes; and then point to the first name on the map.

Fritz Kohn pointed to "KERRY, IRELAND." This is how the name Kerry came to replace the jewish surname of "KOHN."

Kohn-Kerry was raised Catholic. And he fooled the world for years into believing that he was "IRISH."

A man or woman for that matter who denies who they are, can not possibly lead me "ANYWHERE."

I don't like people who engage in subterfuge and obfuscation. John Kohn-Kerry is a "Master" at both.

So,  Dick Cheney said on Friday that "A DUNK IN WATER MIGHT BE USEFUL TO GET TERRORIST SUPECTS TO TALK." So what?

George Bush who is trying to be liked by the people who despise every fiber of his being, the loons on the left, was quick to come out with a statement saying the United States does not torture prisoners.

If Bush thinks that is going to keep the wolves at bay, he'd better think again. These liberal wackos loathe the man. They loathe him because he is not decadent like them. And because he believes in "GOD AND ALSO FEELS THERE IS GOOD AND EVIL IN THE WORLD." The loopy left just want Bush to go away.  They feel that the 1st Amendment was written for only them. The liberal left also feels that they "OWN AMERICA."

These are the same cowards who will not pick up a weapon to defend this great land. However, they will ride the backs of others, who have made the ultimate sarifice. Does the name, Bill "BJ" Clinton ring any bells for you?

Listen to the words of the man who gave credence to the words "Flip Flop", John Kohn-Kerry:

"IS THE WHITE HOUSE THAT WAS FOR TORTURE BEFORE IT WAS AGAINST IT, NOW FOR TORTURE AGAIN?

Huh? "Flipper," Kohn-Kerry just don't know when to keep his big mouth shut. And to think this idiot feels he's Mensa Material.

To think that this man could become President of the United States. This is very scary stuff. Thank God for "Real Americans" who will not turn the reigns of this government over to this incompetent fake.

Where was this hypocrite at when Al Qaeda severed the head from the body of Pfc. Kristian Mechaca, age 23 of Houston, Texas?

Where was this Bozo at when the "Decapitated" body of Pfc. Thomas L. Tucker, age 25 of Madras, Oregon was found along side that of Mechaca's in Iraq earlier this year?

Oh yeah, Kohn-Kerry can become morally outraged when the enemy is allegedly placed in harm's way. However, this loquacious blowhard loses his ability to speak when our men and women are savagely murdered. You can stop wondering what side this phony is on.  His works speak for themselves.

Larry Cox, executive director of Amnesty International USA, (YAWN) stated:

"WHAT'S REALLY A NO-BRAINER IS THAT NO U.S. OFFICIAL, MUCH LESS A VICE-PRESIDENT, SHOULD CHAMPION TORTURE. VICE-PRESIDENT CHENEY'S ADVOCACY OF WATER BOARDING SETS A NEW HUMAN RIGHTS LOW AT A TIME WHEN HUMAN RIGHTS IS ALREADY AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION BARREL"

 

Hey Cox, what about Al-Qaeda's "Human Rights Violations?" What's that, you have no comment?  What did you say about the grisly killings of Mechaca and Tucker?  WHAT? No comment again. The fact of the matter is these front groups for Al Qaeda dare not say anything negative about the thugs and punks of this savage organization.

So, they pick on the world's only "Super-Power," that being the United States. These cowards understand full well that they can impugn the good name of the United States and not have to fear for their lives. Al Qaeda, that's an entirely different story.

If they had any testes at all, they would "Call Al Qaeda Out."  Hey Cox, "NO GUTS, NO GLORY."

These idiots don't get it.  The savages they are rooting for will kill them "FIRST" if God forbid, they ruled the world. They would be killed first, because they "HAVE NO GUTS."

Folks, believe me, we shouldn't lose any sleep over what Kohn-Kerry has to say or Larry Cox; or the so-called Int' Red Cross. And don't confuse this latter group with the Red Cross in our country. They are not the same people. The Int' Red Cross "Is Red Alright, Commie Red."

At one time in this country, there was a gentlemen's agreement that politics should stop "AT THE RIVER'S EDGE." Heck, don't try to sell that to Kohn-Kerry or the terrorists friends, Amnesty International, or their other allies, the Int'l Red Cross.

These people are no friend of the American people. However, we need to keep a close eye on people like the Kohn-Kerrys and so-called groups like Amnesty International.

Our freedoms and our very lives are at stake.

MY BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION" CAN BE PURCHASED AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE AND AT WWW.AMAZON.COM .

MY OTHER TREATISE, "I HAD TO SAY IT" CAN BE PURCHASED AT WWW.AMAZON.COM .

2006/10/27

"IS GEORGE BUSH A DOLLAR SHORT, AND A DAY LATE ON KEY CONSERVATIVE ISSUES"

@ 05:29 AM (36 months, 27 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH, WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

                                 WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

 

With only days until the mid-term elections, President George W. Bush has finally become proactive on two key Conservative issues, (a) Building a fence along the U.S. Mexican border, and (b) Gay Marriages.

In a ceremoney at the White House on Thursday, the President took pen in hand, and signed a bill that paves the way for the erection of a 700-mile fence along this country's southwestern border.

Then, the President "Shot Himself In The Foot." After signing the bill, Mr. Bush said that he still favored a major overhaul of this country's immigration laws. Bush was backed into a corner by Conservatives and forced to sign Thursday's bill. Polls also played a role in the President signing this new law.  Polls have repeatedly shown that the American public does not feel comfortable with the ease illegal aliens can slip across the border and into our country.

Nonetheless, Mr. Bush earlier this year supported "Amnesty" for the 10 to 20 million illegal aliens said to be currently living in the United States. His stance has not found favor with millions of Americans.

Bush could have avoided all of this nonsense.  He could have seized this issue from the Democrats, because liberal Democrats have been sitting on the sidelines, not bothering to touch this issue. The Democrats are political oppportunists. They see millions of new potential voters.

Apparently, new voters are more important to the Democratic Party than the safety of this country. So, they have been reticent on the issue of a fence with Mexico.

House Republicans were the smart ones.  They refused to go along with a Senate bill making illegals part of a guest-worker program; which would have lead to eventual citizenship, or to put it another way, "AMNESTY". The President supported the Senate bill. House Republicans called the bill by its correct name," Amnesty For Illegal Aliens."

Bush talked out of both sides of his mouth during yesterday's bill signing:

"I WANT TO THANK THE MEMBERS OF CONGRESS FOR THEIR WORK ON THIS IMPORTANT PIECE OF LEGISLATION. OURS IS A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS. WE'RE ALSO A NATION OF LAW. UNFORTUNATELY, THE UNITED STATES HAS NOT BEEN IN COMPLETE CONTROL OF ITS BORDERS FOR DECADES, AND THEREFORE ILLLEGAL IMMIGRATION HAS BEEN ON THE RISE"

What occurred on Bill Clinton's watch, or George H.W. Bush's watch is not the issue in this election.  The issue is what did Bush do? Largely, the President did absolutely nothing.

The American people can thank the Republican lead house for the soon to be installed 700-mile long fence, not George W. Bush. What the hell was this man thinking about?

Bush was proactive in the debate over gay marriage in 2004. However, after being elected to another four year term, he forgot that this was an issue near and dear to the hearts of Conservatives. Again, he gave Conservatives the shaft.

Now that the liberal New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that gay couples are entitled to the same legal rights and financial benefits as heterosexual couples, Bush is on the campaign stump attempting to reawaken Conservatives. But, it is not Conservatives who need to wake up, it is George W. Bush.

Where has Mr. Bush been on this issue for the past two years? Does he agree with the New Jersey Supreme Court ruling, but is simply hiding his feelings? One has to ask that question given his lais sez faire attitude on this volatile issue.

Maybe the President sees the aformentioned issues as just politics as usual; but these issues are taken very seriously by Conservative Americans.

We want this President to protect us, by any and all means necessary. Of course the liberals love Bush's taciturn behavior on the issue of a fence with Mexico and the loss of his voice on gay marriages.

As activists courts make laws in this country instead of interpreting them, we need a President who is "Proactive And Not Reactive  On Salient Issues." We need a President who will use the White House as his bully pulpit. We need this President to "SAY WHAT HE MEANS, AND MEAN WHAT HE SAYS."

The traditional family as we know it is under threat from the homosexual community. Being legally married will not make these people happy. Their carnality will scream out for something else once activists courts across the land tell them its okay to trade vows with persons of the same sex. Gay people will always be viewed as an anathema by millions in this society. Opening this pandora's box to gay marriages across the country will spell the end of our civilization.

Larceny lies in the soul of every man and woman.  If gay marriages become the law of the land, can not polygamy be not far behind? And after polygamy, what would be the next battleground? Marrying one's sister? Far-fetched you say? Well, thirty years ago, if I had told you that gay marriage would be legal in the state of Massachusetts, you would have no doubt snickered at me.

Man is a carnal creature.  Man also has a short memory when it comes to his history. I see man as masochistic, because man apparently loves pain.

 

MY NEW BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION" CAN BE PURCHASED AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE .

 

MY BOOK OF ESSAYS ENTITLED, "I HAD TO SAY IT" IS AVAILABLE AT, WWW.AMAZON.COM

2006/10/26

"THE HIT AND RUN MEDIA CARRIES THE DEMS WATER"

@ 04:28 PM (36 months, 27 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

 

Anyone with a scintilla of intelligence understands by now that, "The Hit And Run Media" is carrying the water for the Democratic Party.

With the mid-term elections less than two weeks away, "The Hit And Run Media" has stepped up its water carrying.

Of course there are people out there who don't mind having someone fill their heads with "Mush." These people are the good little libs that you could sell the Brooklyn Bridge to.  These are the same little fantasy land liberals who believe that "We Are To Blame For Terrorism."  Never mind the fact that it was the IslamoFascists who ordered planes be driven into the "Twin Towers, the Pentagon And Crashed A Plane In Pennsylvania."  Blame Bush, Blame Bush. The indefatigable cry of those on the left.

These people read the "New York Times" as if it were the bible. Come to think of it, the Times is sort of like the "Liberal's Bible." To the libs, everything that is printed in the Times is "Gospel." Perish the thought that the Times "Could Have An Open Agenda." And that agenda is antithetical to how most of us would like to see the direction in which our country is taken.

The New York Times is part of "The Hit And Run Media Cabal."  It is the job of the Hit And Run Media to print or report, knowingly false/misleading information.  The latter is the "Hit." After gaining as much mileage out of a "Hit Piece," "The Hit And Run Media" will "Run To Their Next Victim."

There are some who will argue that there is no collusion between the "Hit And Run Media" and the Democratic Party. These people are either, (1) Part of the "GroupThink" phenomenon (2) They can't stand the truth. Believe it or not, there are people out there who can not deal with the truth. Continuing in a state of denial help these individuals "Cope." Or, so they think. If they had to look at the truth, their fragile veneer would come crashing down around them.  Depending on their level of "Ego-Strength," the lib would either work through his/her denial or enter into a perpetual state of "Thumb Sucking." However, this would be tatamount to another defense mechanism. Finally, if you insist there is no collusion between "The Hit and Run Media" and the Democratic Party, chances are, your Intelligence Quotient is probably in the low average range.

When I picked up my liberal newspaper this morning, I was taken aback somewhat, by one of the paper's headlines. It read, "HEVESI DEFENDS ETHICS IN DEBATE." Now, reading the headline, one would think that Alan Hevesi provided incontrovertible proof that he did nothing wrong. Wouldn't you assume that? If so, you would be "Dead Wrong".

Alan Hevesi is the Comptroller for the state of New York.  This is the same Alan Hevesi who joked and said, " Senator Chuck Shumer would put a bullet between the President's eyes, if he could get away with it."

Like the good little lib that he is, Hevesi said "I AM SORRY." And all was forgiven.  And "The Hit And Run Media" went back to doing "Hit Pieces On Republicans."

This dunderhead, Alan Hevesi was found guilty by the State Ethics Commission for using his public office to secure unwarranted privileges for himself and his wife. This is what the little sleaze ball did. He ordered a government workers to be "His Wife's Chauffeur." Some nerve, huh?

When the slime-ball got caught, he made full restitution. Sorry, Alan, that is not good enough. In his debate with his Republican challenger, Christopher Callaghan, Hevesi was placed on the "Hot Seat."

According to my liberal newspaper, which appears to be cheering for Hevesi, the sleaze ball "Defended Himself."

Think about this for just a moment, isn't this paper's headline telling the state's Ethics Commission that they "Have It All Wrong?" Isn't this newspaper, with its banner headline, exonerating this arrogant idiot?

But, that is so typical of "The Hit And Run Media."  When one of their guys gets his tail caught between the cracks, the media speeds off down the road, and performs a rescue worthy of an endeavor undertaken by  a Marine Corps Recon team. 

 Do you honestly believe that if Hevesi was a Republican, he would have been accorded such a wonderful headline?

The paper lauded Hevesi throughout the article. Another headline read, "HEVESI OFFERS VIGOROUS DEFENSE." Still, another headline noted, "HEVESI GOES ON OFFENSIVE." Just when I thought the paper had completed its apple polishing. They offered this nauseating headline. "HEVESI, EXTENSIVE EXPLANATION."

Anyone doing a surface read of this article would probably go away saying, the guy didn't do anything wrong. That is the problem with "The Hit And Run Media."  They don't report the news, they try to make it.  "The Hit And Run Media" is also in the business of "Shaping Your Thinking."

In other words, "The Hit And Run Media" treats its readers/viewers/listeners like "AN EXPERIMENT."

The tragedy of this story, or should I say "Endorsement Of Hevesi's Outlandish/Arrogant Behavior" is that my local newspaper "BURIED" the real story.  For what it is worth, "Hours" before the debate, Governor George Pataki announced that he would make a decision by Friday on whether to proceed "WITH  AN IMPEACHMENT PROCESS AGAINST HEVESI."

The news about an impeachment process should have been the paper's lead. However, the paper was too busy defending Hevesi and carrying the water for the Democratic party.

It is the public that ultimate loses when the press enages in "Selecting Our Representatives."

Heretofore, that has not been the job of the news media. Alas, this is a new day, and the people who hide behind the 1st Amendment are seeking to abridge our rights as Americans.

 

AVAILABLE AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE, MY NEW BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO EACAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION."

AVAILABLE AT WWW.AMAZON.COM, MY BOOK OF ESSAYS , "I HAD TO SAY IT."

 

 

 

2006/10/25

"THE TRUE DEFINITION OF A SECULAR PROGRESSIVE"

@ 11:11 AM (36 months, 28 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

 

The time has come to set the record straight as to what a true "Secular Progressive" is.

I attempted to define the definition of a Secular Progressive in my book, "The Diary Of A Black Man Who Escaped From The Democratic political Plantation." Apparently, my words were not cogent enough; or the people who continue to mis-use the term have not had a chance to read my book; or, they simply don't care, because they have a social agenda to push.

Fox's Bill O'Reilly leads the charge nightly with his mis-use of the words, Secular Progressives. Personally, I am shocked that Mr. "O" misses the point on these two distinct words. Bill used to be a public school teacher. I am un-sure as to what courses he taught.  Nevertheless, Mr. O'Reilly is a bright man.  Therefore, I am perplexed over his continued mis-use of the term "Secular Progressives."

Like the words "Disinformation and Misinformation," Secular Progressives are being used in an interchangeable manner. However, Disinformation and Misinformation are not the same. Disinformation deals with "Government" releasing to the people, false and misleading information. Misinformation means what the word implies; A Person, i.e., your neighbor or a political candidate, misleading the public with false information. We see a lot of the latter every two to four years.

To find the true meaning of the words Secular Progressives, all one needs to do is consult Mr. Webster.  It really isn't that onerous, believe me. All you have to do is turn a few pages. This is all that I did. I present to you , the definition of the words Secular Progressives:

SECULAR= 1. PERTAINING TO TO WORLDLY THINGS OR TO THINGS NOT REGARDED AS SACRED; TEMPORAL. 2. NOT RELATING TO OR CONCERNED WITH RELIGION (OPPOSED TO SACRED). 3. CONCERNED WITH NON-RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS; SECULAR SCHOOLS.

PROGRESSIVE= 1. ADVOCATING PROGRESS OR REFORM, ESP. IN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL MATTERS. 2. EMPLOYING OR ADVOCATING MORE LIBERAL IDEAS, NEW METHODS, ETC. A PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY. 3. GOING FORWARD OR ONWARD; PASSING SUCCESSIVELY FROM ONE STAGE TO THE NEXT. 4. CONTINUOUSLY INCREASING IN EXTENT OR SEVERITY AS A DISEASE.

A Secularist is "Carnal In Nature."  In other words, that person is lead by his fleshly needs. A Secularist does not believe in God. In fact, these people feel that they "ARE GOD." Secularists are responsible for the mess our country is in today. For example, the expulsion of God from our schools.  The rejection of God at Christmas. Are you listening ACLU? The dismantling of the word family as we know it. The Secularists with the help of secular courts in this country, are tearing our families apart.

The homosexual community falls under the rubric of Secularism. Those who support abortion are Secularists. Homosexuals with the help of a Secular Court in Massachusetts opened the door to "Legal" homosexual marriages. Residents of the state of Massachusetts can marry those of the same gender.  This is Secularism at its worst.  I say this because worst case scenario finds gay marriages being the law of the land. If that takes place, what happens to the proliferation of the human race? Two men "CAN NOT MAKE A CHILD." "TWO WOMEN CAN NOT MAKE A CHILD."  I don't care how intoxicated man becomes with his power.  He can not defy the biological will of God.

As Webster notes, a Secularist's desires are temporal. In other words, it is not long before his fleshly body "Cries Out For Something Else, Even More Decadent." There "Is No satisfying the Secular body."

A Secularist is undisciplined. A Secularist is a danger to our society. He is a danger because he can not say "NO" to his body when it begins to lust for something new.

A society that is based on a Secular paradigm is doomed to be devoured by its own lustful greed.  Look at history, and you will find that mighty empires have fallen because of Secularism.  When God is omitted, man is bound to perish.  The founders forwarned us of this day.  Sadly, we have not listened.

The term "Progressive" is not a bad word altogether.  It took Progressives like Dr. King to change the Jim Crow south. What about Brown vs. The Board Of Education? The subsequent Supreme Court ruling against defacto school segregation, was certainly Progressive; and an excellent ruling at that. When Truman integrated the Armed Forces, that was a "Progressive Call."  When society "As A Whole Benefits From A Progressive Change," we are all better for it. However, you can not place pro-abortionists and homosexuals in the camp of "Progressives." Doing this, simply skews the word.  These people are just plain "Secularists."

Tell me, what is "Progressive" about killing a child at full term?  What is "Progressive" about taking God out of our schools? What is "Progressive" about the homosexual agenda? What is "Progressive" about telling people they don't have to work; let government sent them a check each month? What is "Progressive" about encouraging young girls to become pregnant? What is "Progressive about the filthy music that comes across our airwaves these days? What is "Progressive" about the disrespect that we see in our society today? What is so "Progressive" about looking at the "Crack Of a Young Man's Butt' because his pants sag to the ground? The kids call it "SAGGIN." Do yourself a favor, spell this word backwards.

Our country is going to hell in a handbasket. What we do not need are people going on the air each night and giving aid and comfort to the opposition, by mis-using the term "Secular Progressives"; which speaks to diabolical societal change.

The term Secular Progressives sounds benign.  But, it is a cancer, and left un-checked, these people will destroy each and every one of us.

"MICHAEL J, FOX, ACTS MORE LIKE A WOLF"

@ 06:13 AM (36 months, 29 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

 

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

The wolf is a cunning canine.  He will size up its prey, and will attack when the vunerable animal he is tracking, least expects it. His voraciousness is unrelenting. The wolf will not cease his attack until "The Enemy" is consumed.

The wolf is a feared animal. He is unpredictable; and gives no quarter in sparing the life of a vanquished foe.

The Democrats "Released" Michael J. Fox last week on America. This transplanted Canadian is yet another "October Surprise" from this  shameless party, which is devoid of any ideas for moving America forward. The Democrats are "Masters Of The Game Of Gotcha Politics."

I write in my book, "The Diary Of A Black Man Who Escaped From The Democratic Political Plantation," that the Democrats will say and do anything to regain control of Capitol Hill. I now have an appendage to the above caveat.  The Democrats will use people who have been rendered impaired from a personal tragedy; or one who is suffering from a physical malady.

Michael J. Fox suffers from Parkinson Disease. More on that later.  Remember when Ann Coulter wrote in her book, "The Church Of Liberalism--Godless" that liberals will only showcase people that we can not respond to? Well, to buttress her point, Ann pointed to the so-called "Jersey Girls", and Cindy Sheehan. Conservatives couldn't respond to Sheehan when she called the President of the United States "A Bastard." Why couldn't we respond? Little Cindy "Was Grieving The Loss Of Her Son Casey."

The Jersey Girls campaigned actively for Democratic Presidential Candidate, John Kerry in 2004. These four women were angry at George Bush because their husbands died during the cowardly attack on America by IslamoFascists in 2001. They felt that George Bush possessed some type of  "Magical Power he could have used "To Stop The Attack"; but he didn't use his "Super-Powers."

Coulter points out that we could not say anything negative about the Jersey Girls, or we faced being called "Mean or Evil."  However, people like Sheehan and the Jersey Girls could roam the country using George Bush and Republicans as if they were their own personal "Punching Bags."

Now, the "WOLF" has been turned loose:And we are all suppose to go, ahhh!!! Isn't Mikey pitiful? Meantime, this guy is beating the hell out of Republicans with his words. Little Mikey shakes, rattles, and rolls as he delivers his heart wrenching 30-second speech about stem cell research on televisions across this great land. The question is, is Michael J. Fox telling the truth?

Fox is supporting Benjamin L. Cardin, who is running for the Senate in Maryland, Senate candidate Claire McCaskill in Missouri and Wisconsin Governor, Jim Doyle.

Fox is not telling the American public the truth about Senator Talent.  It is not true as Fox reports that Talent wants to outlaw stem cell research. Here is the real truth. Talent is against Missouri's Amendment 2, which if approved would open the door to human cloning in the state of Missouri.

Michael J. Fox is a Democrat. And therefore, he conducts himself in a shameful manner, when he airs commercials that are full of misinformation.

We must remember that Michael J. Fox is an actor; mediocre, but nevertheless, the man is an actor.  What he and his Democrat cronies are attempting to do is pull at the heartstrings of Americans. Their tactics are so patently clear.

Because he goes on the air, and shakes: we are supposed to run to the polls on November 7th, and vote for the candidates "THAT MICHAEL J. FOX ENDORSES."  I don't think so.

Michael, you should be ashamed of yourself for using your disease in an attempt to cause voters to feel sorry for you. But alas, you sir,  "Are A Shameless Democrat".

Because you have elected to go public with lies and misformation, you therefore, leave yourself open for rebuttal. You will not be given a "Free Pass."

 

MY BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION CAN BE PURCHASE AT WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE.

MY BOOK, "I HAD TO SAY IT," CAN BE FOUND AT WWW.AMAZON.COM .

 

 

2006/10/24

"THE COST OF THE SEXUAL REVOLUTION"

@ 06:36 AM (36 months, 29 days ago)

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

 

When I was a teen in the 1960's, the sexual revolution erupted.  Before that, we lived in a "Victorian Age" as far as sex was concerned.  Lucy and Ricky were legally married, but they slept in separate beds.  I always wondered, how did they copulate?  They did have children, but treated each other in the bedroom like someone who had the dreaded disease of leprosy.

Father Knows Best was another of those saccharin shows. The Andersons had a large brood, but they too slept apart.  I just didn't get it:so when the sexual revolution came along, you didn't have to ask me twice to hop on board.

I became a father at the tender age of eighteen. At the time, I was a young U.S. Marine, stationed in Asbury Park, New Jersey. Today, my son is 41-years old.  He has his own family; and is very Conservative in his views. I am so proud of my son, Mark and my daughter-in-law, Maria.  I am equally proud of my grandchildren that Mark and Maria have given me. Melana and Nicholas have a special place in my heart.

Like I said, I couldn't understand "The Uptight" behavior of the Andersons and the Ricardos.  Today, I do. 

The message that was being sent was simple.  What I do in my bedroom is my business; and they were also teaching us all about decorum.  The sexual revolution is the antithesis of what the Anderson and Ricardos were trying to get us to see.

Not only did the sexual revolution open the door to promiscuity: it also opened the doors to "Alternate Lifestyles."  In other words, people came out in the open and announced they were, (1) Gay, or (2) Bi-Sexual. Prior to the sexual revolution, Gay people "Kept Their Business To Themselves." My, how things have changed.

Recently, in Atlanta, Georgia, a young teen "Counted Down" her suicide attempt via text messages to another girl.  Louise Egan Brunstand, age 16, was upset that her attempts to have sex with her classmate were spurned.

Prosecutors in Georgia say Brunstand "was actually counting down her imminent threat" by saying, "Nine, Eight, Seven, Six, I'm going to do it."

What Brunstand did was drive the family's Mercedes-Benz across a turning lane and into oncoming traffic.  The Mercedes was reportedly traveling at a high rate of speed on busy Roswell Road in the affluent neighborhood of, Buckhead. 

Brunstand ended up smashing her car head-on into a smaller vehicle being driven at the time by 30-year old Nancy Salado-Mayo. Mrs. Mayo was killed instantly.  Her middle child, Lesley, 6-months, was in a child safety seat.  Nevertheless, the infant sustained fractured ribs and other injuries.

Brunstand only suffered an ankle injury.  She reportedly had told friends that she planned to take her life because another female student at Holy Innocents Episcopal School rebuffed her attempts to have sex with her.

Brunstand's attorney is attempting to "Spin The Story" to her client's advantage.  According to attorney Drew Findling, Brunstand and her family "Are Devastated By This Horrible Accident and the Death Of Mrs. Salado-Mayo." 

Really?  Guess what "Miss Hot Pants."  Mario Bibiano, a steel worker, did not attend his wife's funeral.  Why? He was by the side of his young daughter.  Your run away hormones have wrecked the lives of this family.  I hope the good people of the state of Georgia "Throw The Book" at you.

This girl's actions were pre-meditated.  She was only thinking of herself when she killed Nancy Saldo-Mayo; and left her children without a mother.

My question is, where were the parents of this obviously troubled young girl at?  You will never convince me that they didn't know their child had deep psychological issues that needed redress through intensive psychotherapy. 

The family has money.  How else do you explain a 16-year old driving a "Mercedes-Benz? Chances are the parents of Louise Egan Brunstad tried to appease their daughter by giving her the material things their money can afford. However, they should have been parents.  They should have been involved in the life of their troubled child.

My other question is, why didn't the friends of Brunstad tell her parents of her intentions to take her life; or why didn't the "Friends" telephone police. Now, these so-called friends will have to live with their decision to shut their mouths, and close their eyes.

Like I said, I am much wiser to the detriments of the sexual revolution. Today, Men and Women have no shame or respect for one another.  You meet someone that you like, and you just hop into bed.  It's as simple as that.  STD's (SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES)  be damned.

But, when someone rejects our overtures to have sex, we take an innocent life.

The sexual revolution in America has not been a boon.  It has been a curse, and each day someone is paying for their inabilitity to keep their homones in check.

The Andersons and the Ricardos knew what they were doing. I wish that I could say the same for those in our society today.

 

MY NEW BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION" IS NOW ON SALE AT, WWW.XLIBRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE.

 

MY BOOK, "I HAD TO SAY IT" CAN BE FOUND AT, WWW.AMAZON.COM

 

2006/10/23

"GOP'S ARROGANCE FORCE VOTERS TO HOLD THEIR NOSES AND VOTE DEMOCRATIC"

@ 04:29 AM (37 months, 1 day ago)

FOREST LEWIS, PH.D.                 

Read the rest of this entry ... (1105 words left)

2006/10/22

"IS NOTHNG SACROSANCT TO LIBERALS?"

@ 07:33 AM (37 months, 1 day ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

Just when I thought liberals couldn't sink any lower, along comes former CBS News Correspondent, Marvin Kalb.

Appearing on Fox News Saturday night, Kalb said he agreed with CNN'S decision to show a U.S. Serviceman being shot in the head by an insurgent sniper in Iraq.

Said an obviously angry Kalb, "The American people need to see what they are paying for."  Kalb also took note of the upsurge in violence in Iraq.

Julie Banderas, the host of the Fox show, couldn't help but fawn all over Kalb. In fact, she acted like a "little school girl" who had fallen in love with her college professor. Banderas never  "ONCE" challenged Kalb over his ridiculous comments.

When Banderas opened the telephone lines to callers, a nervous woman on the other end told Kalb that he would have a different opinion if that had been his son being shown around the world.  Kalb, quickly dismissed the caller and pompously said the woman in essense "was missing the point." That is the point "Professor Kalb."

This liberal is willing to go to any length to embarass President Bush. So what if someone's son is being shown moments before "HIS BRAINS ARE BLOWN FROM HIS HEAD."  That is the cost of war, right "professor kalb?" I use lower case in addressing Kalb, because he is "a little man."

Hey professor kalb, where were you at during the Vietnam War?  I don't recall seeing your "Spinless Ass In Uniform."  It is liberals like you who are willing to send someone else's son off to war, while you stay at home and pontificate. Yeah, the world needs to hear you trash our Soldiers and Marines.

How in all that is holy can a human being say that it is alright to show an American being shot in the head is sheer lunacy to me. Can not liberals draw the line somewhere in the sand and say, this is where we will stop?  Are they that angry, that they don"t "Give A Hoot" about the family of the dead Soldier?

I have fought in a war.  I have seen my fellow Marines with limbs blown off; and shot between the eyes.  There is nothing "Newsworthy" about showing that. You don't sit like "professor kalb" did last night, with total cofidence, when you see the "Price Of War."  No, my friend, scenes like what I described above makes you want "TO PUKE."

What CNN did was cold and heartless.  They are definitely no friend of the American public. They are a mouthpiece for Al Qaeda and any other rogue group of thugs.  These arrogant asses took a videotape from the enemy and showed it to the world.  Congratulation, CNN for "YOUR FINE PUBLIC SERVICE WORK." I'm sure that Al Qaeda will be contacting you with more despicable videotapes.  And I'm sure that "AFTER HOURS OF AGONIZING OVER WHETHER TO RUN THE TAPE OR NOT, YOU WILL OPT TO PERFORM YOUR USUAL PUBLIC SERVICE." 

Actually, it is not a public service that CNN is attempting to perform.  These self-serving slobs are performing for themselves.  And all the while, our men and women are dying for these ungrateful swines. The actions of CNN should give "Every Patriotic American A Sick Feeling In the Pit Of Their Stomachs".

Remember, these are the people who had a former correspondent in bed with Saddam and his crew , before the start of the 2003 war.  Peter Arnett was "The Songbird" for Saddam, way before "Baghdad Bob."

I wonder, did "Anyone" at CNN consider the feelings of the dead Soldier's parents?  I doubt it.  When you are out to serve yourself, you only think of one thing, "YOURSELF."

It is creeps like "professor kalb" that really get under my skin.  This panty-waist liberal would probably fold up like a wallet, if he had to fight in a war.  Which was it "professor," bad feet, or was it a bad heart?  Is this what kept your sorry ass out of our nation's uniform?  Kalb is just like his hero, Bill "BJ" Clinton. He did everything within his power to avoid wearing our nation's military uniform. Yet, these two cowards don't mind seeing someone else's child die;and we have to listen to idiots like Kalb and Clinton invade our airwaves with their big mouths; spewing their venomous, vitriolic comments.

We have always known that Bill Clinton was a coward.  Now, we know that "professor marvin kalb" is not only a coward, but he is also heartless.

 

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:  WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

                                   WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

                                   WWW.RENEWAMERICA.US  

 

 

DON'T FORGET THAT YOU CAN PICK UP MY NEW BOOK, "THE DIARY OF A BLACK MAN WHO ESCAPED FROM THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION" AT, WWW.XLIBRRIS.COM/BOOKSTORE. THIS IS A FASCINATING READ ABOUT DIRTY TRICKS WITHIN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, AND HOW THEY HOLD AFRICAN-AMERICANS, THEIR CORE BASE, ON "THE DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL PLANTATION.

 

MY OTHER BOOK, "I HAD TO SAY IT, " CAN BE PURCHASED AT, WWW.AMAZON.COM .

2006/10/20

"AL QAEDA IS TRYING TO CONTROL THE U.S. ELECTION"

@ 12:44 PM (37 months, 3 days ago)

"AL QAEDA IS TRYING TO CONTROL THE U.S. ELECTION"

Read the rest of this entry ... (758 words left)

2006/10/19

"THE KING TREATS HIS PUBLIC LIKE PEASANTS" BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

@ 11:58 AM (37 months, 4 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

Read the rest of this entry ... (490 words left)

"SHOULD GEORGE BUSH STEP DOWN?" BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Tags:
@ 05:37 AM (37 months, 5 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

WWW.RENEWAMERICA.US

 

 

Liberals are desperate people.  They will say and do anything in order to regain control of the Congress and the U.S. Senate. While liberals are constantly preaching to others about fairness, and "Peace And Love," these people are in bed with some horrid individuals. For example, people like George Soros, the head of MoveOn. Org.  MoveOn.Org is a radical group that is out to change  "The America You And I Grew Up In".

Soros is an angry man, who wants to reshape America's landscape into his warped sense of what a country should look like. Instead of thanking God for allowing him to immigrate to this land of opportunity, this little man "Bites The Hand That Feeds Him." George Soros is a dangerous man, who has spent millions of his own money to further his twisted agenda.

He has a number of Democrats in his backpocket. And when it is time to call in favors, George Soros will be at the head of the line, with his "Greedy Little Paw Fully Extended".  This is why I shudder when I consider the Democrats taking control of the House and possibly the Senate in a few weeks.

If the Democrats regain control of the House, do not look for these vindictive imps to start introducing legislation  designed to move this country forward.  No, the Democrats are out for revenge.  They will be out to punish Republicans. They have already indicated what their myopic view of running the country will be like.

The Democrats will be looking to "Impeach President Bush."  For what, is anyone's guess.  But, you can bet that the Democrats will come up with something that will make you say, "Huh?" John Conyers who has been in the Congress since George Washington served as this nation's first President, reportedly has been conducting "Mock Impeachment Hearings."

The other day when I turned on my computer, there was this pop up ad. The words in the ad startled me at first. The ad read, "SHOULD GEORGE W. BUSH STEP DOWN AS PRESIDENT." The ad was run by a group calling itself "POPULARQ.COM"

I attempted to cull information on this group. However, I would have had better luck at finding the proverbial "Needle In The Haystack."

Popularq.com says it conducts "Independent" surveys. Sure, they do.  The folks at Popularq.com also say what they are doing is only "For Entertainment Purposes."  Sure, they are. Entertainment purposes, My Aunt Tilly.   What is so entertaining about calling for the President of the United States to "Step Down.?"

I forgot.  Liberals have a warped sense of humor. Yes, I believe that Popularq.com is a front group for some shady liberal organization.

Keep in mind folks, liberals along with their buddies at "The Hit And Run News Media" have been using subliminal techniques on you for years. These techniques are supposed to "Shape How You Think."

 Liberals are not the nice "Cuddly Little Fuzz Balls" they would have the world to believe. No,  Liberals are angry; they are angry, "All Of The Time."  Liberals are also vindictive and are constantly concocting ways to bring down the GOP. They have this machine on their side.  It is called, "The Hit And Run News Media."  And no, the media "IS NOT FAIR."

We do not have a Parliamentary form of goverment as Popylarq.com would seem to suggest.  In places like England, Canada, and Israel, where Parliamentary governments are the rule, a Prime Minister can be forced to step down, if faced with a vote of no confidence by the House Of Commons.

The House Of Commons in England, is elected by British citizens.  The political party that wins the most seats in an election forms the government and the leader of that party becomes the Prime Minister.

I don't know about you, but I'm not comfortable with a person leading my country that I know nothning about.  Suffice it to say, I will stick with our two party system of government.

But beware America,  there are forces out there that will do virtually anything to bring this great country to her knees.  They are "That Angry."

 

 

 

2006/10/18

"THE LIBS WON'T LIKE THIS" BY: FOREST LEWIS, PH.D.

@ 04:00 PM (37 months, 5 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

WWW.RENEWAMERICA.COM

 

 

The liberals have a way of fighting that would make my sister proud.  They believe in talking to a killer whose intentions are to end your life.  How they figure that talking with someone who is hell bent on stopping your next breath has always fascinated, and at the same time befuddled me.

A person who has made it up in his mind to kill you is irrational.  It is impossible to talk with someone who has lost the ability to feel or to hear.  It is my clinical opinion that people who have engaged in school shootings are in a psychotic state.  A person suffering from a psychosis is incoherent.  Yet, liberal do not want you to fight with this person; even though his intentions are quite clear.

The good people of Burleson, Texas apparently didn't run this one past Nancy Pelosi or "war hero" John Kerry.  The Independent School District of Burleson has decided to teach their students how to fight back.  In fact, students are being trained to launch a pre-emptive strike on a gunman who enters a classroom. They are taught that in numbers, there is strength.  They are also taught to use tactical manuvers should a gunman confront a classrom full of students.

Burleson is the first school district in the nation to adopt such a policy.  The students are being taught by a group of Texas security experts how to fight back.  The students are taught to "throw their books, book bags, desk and chairs."  The security experts from a company called "Response Options" say the students should "use everything and anything to disrupt and take down a gunman".

Major Robin Browne of the British Army is part of Response Options. And the Major hits the nail on the head when he declared:

"THIS IS NOT A BURGLAR.  THIS IS NOT A BANK ROBBER. THIS IS SOMEONE WHO HAS COME ONTO SCHOOL PROPERTY WITH THE EXPRESS INTENTION OF USING A DEADLY WEAPON TO HURT AND DOMINATE PEOPLE WHO CANNOT NECESSARILY DEFEND THEMSELVES.  A PERSON WHO ENTERS A SCHOOL IS IN THE SAME CATEGORY AS SERIAL KILLERS"

 

Given this is the personality of a school shooter as Browne notes, how is it possible to "talk with that person" as liberals would suggests? 

Browne also states that people who shoot our children while they are at school are "Predators." And Major Browne says a predator will take advantage of its prey.

It comes as no surprise that this program does have it critics.  The critics come from outside of Burleson.  ABC news reports that Texas safety experts "Are appalled at the notion of students being trained to storm a person with a weapon."

One of those Texas safety experts is Ronald Stephens, executive director of National School Safety.  He points out, "When it comes to fighting an attacker even SWAT teams have a hard time knowing what to do.  How can we expect kids to know what to do".  Stephenson added that "the child who leads the charge is most vulnerable".

Stephens misses the point.  A gunman who comes to school has the intentions of "Killing People." These are difficult times in which we live in.  The libs have already raised a generation of "Wimpy kids."

The libs don't even want our kids playing dodge ball.  Why? Someone might get their feelings hurt. 

The libs don't want our teachers arming themselves. Can these people do nothing but try to instill fear into Americans? I understand that this is a tough call, having students going up against an armed gunman.   However, what other alternatives do they have? Sit like sheep being lead to the slaughter?  Forget talking folks; it just won't work.

I pray that the kids in the Burleson school district "Will Never" have to use the instructions that they have been given.