"THE TRUTH"

2006/10/25

"THE TRUE DEFINITION OF A SECULAR PROGRESSIVE"

@ 11:11 AM (37 months, 15 days ago)

FRIENDS OF THE TRUTH:

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

 

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

     CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST

 

 

The time has come to set the record straight as to what a true "Secular Progressive" is.

I attempted to define the definition of a Secular Progressive in my book, "The Diary Of A Black Man Who Escaped From The Democratic political Plantation." Apparently, my words were not cogent enough; or the people who continue to mis-use the term have not had a chance to read my book; or, they simply don't care, because they have a social agenda to push.

Fox's Bill O'Reilly leads the charge nightly with his mis-use of the words, Secular Progressives. Personally, I am shocked that Mr. "O" misses the point on these two distinct words. Bill used to be a public school teacher. I am un-sure as to what courses he taught.  Nevertheless, Mr. O'Reilly is a bright man.  Therefore, I am perplexed over his continued mis-use of the term "Secular Progressives."

Like the words "Disinformation and Misinformation," Secular Progressives are being used in an interchangeable manner. However, Disinformation and Misinformation are not the same. Disinformation deals with "Government" releasing to the people, false and misleading information. Misinformation means what the word implies; A Person, i.e., your neighbor or a political candidate, misleading the public with false information. We see a lot of the latter every two to four years.

To find the true meaning of the words Secular Progressives, all one needs to do is consult Mr. Webster.  It really isn't that onerous, believe me. All you have to do is turn a few pages. This is all that I did. I present to you , the definition of the words Secular Progressives:

SECULAR= 1. PERTAINING TO TO WORLDLY THINGS OR TO THINGS NOT REGARDED AS SACRED; TEMPORAL. 2. NOT RELATING TO OR CONCERNED WITH RELIGION (OPPOSED TO SACRED). 3. CONCERNED WITH NON-RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS; SECULAR SCHOOLS.

PROGRESSIVE= 1. ADVOCATING PROGRESS OR REFORM, ESP. IN POLITICAL AND SOCIAL MATTERS. 2. EMPLOYING OR ADVOCATING MORE LIBERAL IDEAS, NEW METHODS, ETC. A PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY. 3. GOING FORWARD OR ONWARD; PASSING SUCCESSIVELY FROM ONE STAGE TO THE NEXT. 4. CONTINUOUSLY INCREASING IN EXTENT OR SEVERITY AS A DISEASE.

A Secularist is "Carnal In Nature."  In other words, that person is lead by his fleshly needs. A Secularist does not believe in God. In fact, these people feel that they "ARE GOD." Secularists are responsible for the mess our country is in today. For example, the expulsion of God from our schools.  The rejection of God at Christmas. Are you listening ACLU? The dismantling of the word family as we know it. The Secularists with the help of secular courts in this country, are tearing our families apart.

The homosexual community falls under the rubric of Secularism. Those who support abortion are Secularists. Homosexuals with the help of a Secular Court in Massachusetts opened the door to "Legal" homosexual marriages. Residents of the state of Massachusetts can marry those of the same gender.  This is Secularism at its worst.  I say this because worst case scenario finds gay marriages being the law of the land. If that takes place, what happens to the proliferation of the human race? Two men "CAN NOT MAKE A CHILD." "TWO WOMEN CAN NOT MAKE A CHILD."  I don't care how intoxicated man becomes with his power.  He can not defy the biological will of God.

As Webster notes, a Secularist's desires are temporal. In other words, it is not long before his fleshly body "Cries Out For Something Else, Even More Decadent." There "Is No satisfying the Secular body."

A Secularist is undisciplined. A Secularist is a danger to our society. He is a danger because he can not say "NO" to his body when it begins to lust for something new.

A society that is based on a Secular paradigm is doomed to be devoured by its own lustful greed.  Look at history, and you will find that mighty empires have fallen because of Secularism.  When God is omitted, man is bound to perish.  The founders forwarned us of this day.  Sadly, we have not listened.

The term "Progressive" is not a bad word altogether.  It took Progressives like Dr. King to change the Jim Crow south. What about Brown vs. The Board Of Education? The subsequent Supreme Court ruling against defacto school segregation, was certainly Progressive; and an excellent ruling at that. When Truman integrated the Armed Forces, that was a "Progressive Call."  When society "As A Whole Benefits From A Progressive Change," we are all better for it. However, you can not place pro-abortionists and homosexuals in the camp of "Progressives." Doing this, simply skews the word.  These people are just plain "Secularists."

Tell me, what is "Progressive" about killing a child at full term?  What is "Progressive" about taking God out of our schools? What is "Progressive" about the homosexual agenda? What is "Progressive" about telling people they don't have to work; let government sent them a check each month? What is "Progressive" about encouraging young girls to become pregnant? What is "Progressive about the filthy music that comes across our airwaves these days? What is "Progressive" about the disrespect that we see in our society today? What is so "Progressive" about looking at the "Crack Of a Young Man's Butt' because his pants sag to the ground? The kids call it "SAGGIN." Do yourself a favor, spell this word backwards.

Our country is going to hell in a handbasket. What we do not need are people going on the air each night and giving aid and comfort to the opposition, by mis-using the term "Secular Progressives"; which speaks to diabolical societal change.

The term Secular Progressives sounds benign.  But, it is a cancer, and left un-checked, these people will destroy each and every one of us.

Comment(s) »

  1. Preach it, Dr. Lewis!

    I am always amazed at how lightly people take the connection between private morality and social responsibility. De Tocqueville saw that religion and the limitations that faithful observance imposed on men provided the checks on human behavior that political liberty could not. At the inception of this nation, founders knew that faith was the social safeguard.

    Straying from these beliefs is more than a personal undoing - it undermines the entire social structure.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/10/25 @ 02:01 PM — (Reply)

  2. I am shocked that Mr. "O" misses the point on these two distinct words

    Nothing he says shocks me, I don't like to watch him.

    I so appreciate what you have to say here. So much truth.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/10/25 @ 03:07 PM — (Reply)

  3. I'm not a fan of his either - I bought his latest book out of sheer curiosity and it was my first and last O'Reilly book. Too shrill.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/10/25 @ 03:47 PM — (Reply)

  4. Watching or reading O'Reilly is not watch the time, electricity and or money. It's too bad demlibs are not honest enough to view some of their own as honestly. O'Reilly is a self serving blowhard. Jackass.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/10/25 @ 03:52 PM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically